🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.